
The power of stereotypes to maintain (or even encourage!) racial AMBIVALENCE lies in their pervasive presence across multiple media outlets. A few instances will not maintain AMBIVALENCE, yet a daily bombardment, despite contrary personal experience, will. This means that a Caucasian person may view her non-violent, non-poor African-American friend as an exception rather than a rule. The rule is, of course, outlined by education and media outlets, such as network news stations broadcasting nightly images of violent African-Americans or poverty-stricken Africans. As with any rule, this definition of "Blackness" is constructed and learned, and while stereotypes often arise from fact, they do not tell the "whole" truth. What is left out of the picture is just as important as what lies inside its frame.
There are numerous instances of mediabites defining a people or a place for decades to come. Ethiopia in the 1980's is a great example. Images such as those presented by Save the Children (Sally Struthers) leave lasting definitions - as if a pathway burned in the brain, many continue to define the "African" as a "skinny, starving kid with diarrhea and flies swarming around her head" Today, we add high HIV statistics and genocide to the impoverished images we ingested in the 80's, leaving us with even bleeker definitions of Africa. As media creators, we now must ask ourselves, how many positive or contrary images will it take to re-define the "Blackness" constructed by these repetitive and extreme stereotypes of poverty and violence?
FOR NEXT WEEK...
READING: Chapters 7 and 8 -
"Affirming Discord" and "Black Power"
PROJECT: LAP worksheet, proposal and annotated bibliography
MEDIA: Please view the following media examples for next class.
Darfur
The One Campaign
Save Africa's Children
Save Africa from Aids
Save the Children International
The Secret to Really Helping Africa
- JOURNAL FIVE - Compare and contrast two of the images presented in the above media clips. What definition of "Blackness" do they offer? Do the different humanitarian organizations construct a single notion of "Blackness"? Or, do they support racial AMBIVALENCE or even ANIMOSITY? How? Do humanitarian campaigns have the right to raise funds and awareness by any means necessary? Or do they have a responsibility to create coherent, consistent images of those they hope to help?


